Some March Madness cliches are more wretched than others

used to rail vs clichés like “Cinderella” and “bubble teams.” Those words, though, have been used so pervasively in discussions about the NCAA Basketball Tournament that they are now as endemic to coverage as March Madness. That’s what makes English perhaps the best language on the planet; words are blended and redefined, in part, through popular usage and changes in society. (God help us, though, if charity stripe eventually makes the cut.)

Sports language has been a big part of our vernacular for more than a century. Baseball, in particular, has a strong hold on how we describe our lives. We go to bat for others, strike out when we fail, and hit a home run when we succeed. Sometimes, though, we throw a Hail Mary pass in a desperate attempt to do well. At other times, a decision or action is a slam dunk.

In rare instances, an athlete has such a profound impact on sports that we employ that name in an attempt to describe actions between the lines. A ruthian effort, for instance, is one in which a baseball player has hit a ball a great distance; it has also been used to assess athletes in other sports. I’ve seen this term applied to performances by LeBron James, an athlete who may one day also be morphed into an adjective. 

This is not to say that we need to embrace clichés. I’d rather bear-hug a cactus. Or a Republican. (Relax. I’m just kidding. Talk about phrases currently loaded with more meaning than they deserve. Politics employ far more clichéd – and calcified – thinking than does sports. Sadly, though, that appears to be changing.) Most worn phrases are just that — letters rubbed clean of precision, not unlike an old coin, making them impediments to clear, creative storytelling. 

Which brings us to the greatest of all ClicheFests: March Madness, the Big Dance – the NCAA basketball tournament. Here are a few clichés that need to be avoided like a Zion Williamson Nike sneaker blowout.

  1. Charity stripe: This is by far the stupidest of all clichés, and one without logic. Has anybody watched a high school basketball game, or, worse, Andre Drummond and Dwight Howard attempt these so-called charitable scoring opportunities. Sometimes, the shooter doesn’t even hit – or reach – the rim. (It’s certainly charitable to call some of these shots actual attempts to score.)

2. Punched their ticket. Here’s one of the many references you’ll read this week: “The Saint Mary’s Gaels punched their ticket to the 2019 NCAA tournament with a 60-47 upset of the top-ranked Gonzaga Bulldogs in the West Coast Conference championship game.”

Please, find a better way to say a team advanced to the NCAA Tournament by winning a conference title game. Or say it as simply as I just did in the previous sentence. Teams do not punch tickets to go to dances, if college students go to dances at all any more. More likely, they are purchasing tickets for dances or concerts or sports events by downloading them. At the very least change the lingo: “Cinderella University Apple Pay’d their way into the NCAA Tournament Saturday when…”

This past week, legendary sportswriter Dan Jenkins passed away. Years ago, he offered some tips on how to improve game coverage, which included my fave, rule No. 1: “Most readers already know who won. See how many paragraphs you can write without putting in the score. This may force you to think of other elements.” 

Jenkins advice

3. Big Dance: This might be the goofiest tournament reference. Big Dance was reportedly first used in 1977 when Marquette University coach Al Maguire, adorned in blue blazers all season, was asked if he would wear one during the NCAA Tournament. Said Maguire: “Absolutely. You gotta wear the blue blazer to the big dance.” That’s as good a story as any, but it’s also as antiquated as blue blazers, wide ties, silk shirts, and school dances. Like language, clichés need to be revitalized for the times. If I had any style, I’d offer some specific suggestions. Better to ask Idris Elba. 

Overall, the best advice: Investigate the why and how to better explain the what, when, where and who. Don’t assume you know when the momentum swings, whether players have mental toughness – or use the word “balling” in any way. There are numerous other basketball references to avoid, such as “dishing assists,” calling teams “road warriors,” saying teams have “signature victories” and “tossing bricks” when shots don’t fall. Avoid them at all cost if you want your work to be noticed – for the right reasons.

FYIHere’s a solid story on the Ohio Valley Conference championship game by the Tennessean. … I love stories such as this one that addresses clichéd ideas in a different manner. This story offered by the NCAA focuses on the metrics behind so-called Cinderella teams. 

-30-

 

Advertisements

About jgisondi

I am the author of the "Field Guide To Covering Sports," the second edition now available from Congressional Quarterly Press/SAGE, and "Monster Trek: The Obsessive Search for Bigfoot" (U of Nebraska Press). Field Guide to Covering Sports, Second Edition goes beyond general guidance about sports writing, offering readers practical advice on covering 20 specific sports. From auto racing to wrestling, author Joe Gisondi gives tips on the seemingly straightforward—like where to stand on the sideline and how to identify a key player—along with the more specialized—such as figuring out shot selection in lacrosse and understanding a coxswain’s call for a harder stroke in rowing. In the new Second Edition, readers also explore sports reporting across multimedia platforms, developing a foundational understanding for social media, mobile media, visual storytelling, writing for television and radio, and applying sabermetrics. Fully revised with new examples and updated information to give readers confidence in covering just about any game, match, meet, race, regatta or tournament, Field Guide to Covering Sports, Second Edition is the ideal go-to resource to have on hand when mastering the beat. In "Monster Trek," Joe Gisondi brings to life the celebrities in bigfoot culture: people such as Matt Moneymaker, Jeff Meldrum, and Cliff Barackman, who explore remote wooded areas of the country for weeks at a time and spend thousands of dollars on infrared imagers, cameras, and high-end camping equipment. Pursuing the answer to why these seekers of bigfoot do what they do, Gisondi brings to the reader their most interesting—and in many cases, harrowing—expeditions. You can order both from Amazon.
This entry was posted in Covering basketball, Sportswriting: Language, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s